Mean Stack vs Mean JS

In the tech world, MEAN web development is quickly gaining popularity. Mean is basically a
stack framework denoting the four versatile technologies like MongoDB, Express,
AngularJS, and Node.js. The principle advantages of these four technologies are the basis of
this framework. Mean Stack is a user-friendly framework which uses a single language of
JavaScript from the user side to the server side. JavaScript runs on every level of the
application and the web development is done in a modern and efficient way. To avail its
enhanced performance and speed, developers are switching from LAMP STACK to MEAN
STACK. Its components are interchangeable, and developers can write both front-end and
back-end of an application in JavaScript.

To talk about the differences between Mean Stack and Mean.js, the first thing to keep in
mind is that both are developed by the same person. Amos Haviv, an Israeli developer is
behind both these stacks. But Amos left Mean.io after almost a year of developing and
maintaining it. He started working on Mean.js. Well, he didn’t like the way it was going or
maybe because Mean.io started to look like an ecosystem with plugins. On the other side,
Mean.js is more the kind of a framework that you need to get a project off the ground. You
may have to look much closer to find out the differences between them.

Both have different objectives and one is more elegant than the other. Other major
differences are noted with the build system, modularity, documentation, community, and
deployment. There is the difference in the boilerplate generation and scaffolding which
means when Mean.js uses Yeoman generators, Mean.io uses a custom tool called ‘mean’.
Mean.io uses the build system gulp while Mean.js uses grunt. The original boilerplate
Mean.io naturally has a larger community. But, Mean.js is also gaining traction and following
up.

These frameworks can be deployed with one-click but Mean.js works on Digital Ocean and
Mean.io on Google compute engine. Comparatively, Mean.js provides excellent
documentation and it utilises modules in the front-end and connects this with express. The
self-contained package modularity with client and server files within the modules is adopted
by Mean.io. The differences that we could bring up comparing these two frameworks are
not big enough to say which one is the best.

This certainly won’t help the developer to decide the best one among them or to select one
of them to work with as well. For short term, maybe using Mean.io would be better as the
major companies use it. This is mainly because it is bigger and already mastered. As the
mastermind behind these two stacks says, Mean.js is one the way to be bigger and better.
Amos also says it is the best for the long term. It certainly is an attempt to make it easier to
work with your own stack. This could be possible with the use of some generators and some
simple tools and life is going to be much easier. You should be considering Meteor if
stability and simplicity are your keywords.

If you want to make it easier in selecting the optimal choice for the objective you need, try
consulting MeanStackMasters. They are the masters in what they do and what they do is
Mean Stack. MeanStackMasters.com is the place where they can be found. Log on to the
website today to meet all your Mean Stack needs.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *